Musing about two Beings
I'm thinking that we're scattering concepts of epistemology amongst ontological concerns: Because we can represent a kind of knowledge with an LLM's output doesn't mean that that in itself qualifies as an acknowledgement by the LLM itself that it has produced knowledge. In fact if it speaks about its production as though it conceived it, then how would an unlike sentient being be expected to respond ? An unlike being who can know as an LLM knows seems pretty farfetched. In some imaginations, sharing knowledge amongst beings has flux, expands and contracts, somewhat like populating neurons, but, alas, quantifying that 'bulbosity' still doesn't represent the qualities of the beings themselves. Human being consciousness evolved after spoken word became dominant over gesture (alongside cave painting and tools, etc). Memorization of instructions (or traditions) became unwieldy, and The best (or oldest) ones who could order that chaos Then transmit (or in...