Ideation-execution gap

"To test whether AI-generated ideas lead to better research outcomes, we conduct an execution study by recruiting 43 expert researchers to execute randomly-assigned ideas, either written by experts or generated by an LLM. 

"Each expert spent over 100 hours implementing the idea and wrote a 4-page short paper to document the experiments. 

"All the executed projects are then reviewed blindly by expert NLP researchers. 

"Comparing the review scores of the same ideas before and after execution, the scores of the LLM-generated ideas decrease significantly more than expert-written ideas on all evaluation metrics (novelty, excitement, effectiveness, and overall; p < 0.05), closing the gap between LLM and human ideas observed at the ideation stage. 

"When comparing the aggregated review scores from the execution study, we even observe that for many metrics there is a flip in rankings where human ideas score higher than LLM ideas. 

"This ideation-execution gap highlights the limitations of current LLMs in generating truly effective research ideas and the challenge of evaluating research ideas in the absence of execution outcomes."
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamza Chaudhry

Swarm 🦹‍♂️

Digital ID tracking system