To err is AI

"AI-generated code is actually prone to more vulnerabilities than human-generated code, raising questions over the reliability of some tools, new data from CodeRabbit has claimed.

"Pull requests made with AI tools had an average of 10.83 issues, compared with 6.45 issues in human-generated pull requests, which is ultimately leading to longer reviews and the potential for more bugs to make it through to the finished product.

"Besides having 1.7x more issues on general, AI-generated pull requests also had 1.4x more critical issues and 1.7x more major issues, so they're not just minor niggles."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamza Chaudhry

Swarm 🦹‍♂️

Digital ID tracking system